Monthly Archive for June, 2005

Page 2 of 7

Orange WiFi?

In a Progress article about poor mobile phone service in Orange County, Kate Andrews writes:

[Orange Board of Supervisors Chairman Mark] Johnson has hopes that a countywide broadband wireless project, for which a timeline has not been set, will help provide better coverage with additional towers.

Can anybody up the road from me in Orange provide any further information about this? Is the county considering blanketing the area in WiFi? Free or at a cost? Is there high-speed service in Orange at all, or is the municipal government doing this because there’s neither broadband availability nor likelihood of it anytime soon?

So many questions…

Al’s Morning Meeting

Here’s a tip for all of you who work for local media,

I’m a big fan of the Poynter Institute, and I just discovered a great service that they offer, in the form of Al’s Morning Meeting. It’s a daily column (M-F) about what’s going on in the world, presented in the format of what would make a good story. Al Tompkins provides questions for journalists to follow up on and potential angles for local media to use to make the story relevant to their region. You can even subscribe to get it by e-mail every day.

If you’re in media, Al’s Morning Meeting should be a part of your morning read.

Drought Danger?

In September of 2002 (my Lord, has it been three years?), the drought left us fast running out of water. Cars were filthy, we weren’t much cleaner, lawns were brown and toilets were left unflushed.

Earlier this week, NBC 29 warned that we could be facing water restrictions soon if we don’t get some more rain. Today the RWSA warns that stream flow is down. ACSA reports that Sugar Hollow, Beaver Creek, South Rivanna, and Totier Creek are full, with Ragged Mountain is down 2.2%.

With nothing more than chances of scattered afternoon thunderstorms in the forecast, Are we headed towards a repeat? More important, are we any better prepared for a drought now than we were in 2002?

Fox 27 (WAHU) On Air

Brian writes: “I was just going through my choice over the air TV and noticed FOX is on the air…now I can watch the World Series this fall.”

I get no love on my TV, but half of my antenna snapped off, and I barely get NBC 29, anyhow. Can anybody else pick up it up? Is there any local content just yet?

Background: Fox to replace PAX (03/11/05) and Charlottesville to get Fox Affiliate (11/05/04).

Lawrence, KS: The future of media.

The New York Times has a fascinating look at the Lawrence (Kansas) Journal-World, a newspaper that truly, truly gets the Internet.

They have a daily and a weekly. They host blogs written by any community members who care to sign up (and feature them on the front page of their website), have a database of local music, host MP3s of local bands, webcast local music, maintain a comprehensive community calendar, encourage the posting of comments at the end of every story, have full RSS feeds of all of their offerings, podcast daily news/music/talk, list restaurant information (with their reviews and reviews from the general public), host and promote local films, make available audio interviews with their story subjects, and surely a lot more — every time I click on a link, I find something else.

Of course, they include all of the things that other newspapers include — classifieds, obituaries, etc., etc. But they’ve gone way beyond the self-imposed constraints of what it means to be a newspaper — they’re a film distribution company, a radio station, a blog host, a community organizing tool, the hub of their whole town, all wrapped up into one.

And they’re not some huge paper. It’s a family-owned paper, around since 1891. They’ve got a circulation of 20,000 but, of course, that’s only counting dead trees. With a solid commitment to making media a two-way street, a willingness to experiment, and an understanding that my generation gets our news online, The Lawrence Journal-World may well be around until 2091. The same can’t be said of many other newspapers.

For two years now, I’ve been telling anybody who will listen that Charlottesville media needs to do the same, and that the first paper to do this well wins. If (for example) C-Ville Weekly adopted the Journal-World model, and the Daily Progress stayed as-is, I truly believe that C-Ville would, in five years, be generally known as being superior to the Progress, and their place in the community and ratecard would reflect that.

I started cvillenews.com (and lists.waldo.net and cvilleblogs.com) to push local media outlets into getting on-line. They’ve done so (and surely would have done so without me), and I’m happy about that. But I’ll be much happier the day that cvillenews.com is useless, because Charlottesvillians think of the media as being “us,” not “them,” so accountable do they seem, and the media are so enmeshed with local life and community that any sense of separation is gone. Here’s hoping that cvillenews.com becomes useless sooner, rather than later.

Sideblog