There’s been a lot of discussion of the knowns, the unknowns, and the what-the-hells? in the case of the four teenagers convicted in the school bombing conspiracy case.
On Wednesday, the Daily Progress‘ Liesel Nowak wrote about the now-named 15-year-old convicted in the case, Alan Newsom, talking with father Fred Newsom about the boy. The name will ring a bell for many: the boy sued Jack Jouett in 2002 after they refused to let him wear his NRA t-shirt at school. The school system’s case was terrible, and Newsom defeated them in court in early 2004, which was a public embarrassment for the Albemarle schools. I have to wonder if he was targeted in this matter as a form of retribution.
Nowak also identified the 16-year-old who pled guilty, WAHS student Dominc Hawranke, saying that he may be in prison until he’s 21. She wrote that she couldn’t learn how the case of the two 13-year-olds ended, because “authorities have said privacy laws prevent them from disclosing the outcomes of the cases.” The very next day, though, Nowak wrote that the two 13-year-olds were found guilty, with the court apparently having changed their minds on what could be released.
Sheila Pell has a piece in this week’s Hook for which she interviewed Fred Newsom and noted local children’s attorney Andy Block, speculating as to what these kids’ futures hold.
Also, Lisa Provence also has coverage of Jim Camblos’ bungling of the case in the current Hook, complete with Camblos denying that he ever said there was a gag order. I have to wonder if Camblos will make good on his threat to go after reporters who print any details of the case.
Finally, Rick Sincere has a thoughtful blog entry on Alan Newsom, what “conspiracy” really means, and about what the lesson is to other students. I’m inclined to agree with Rick’s conclusions.
Recent Comments