Cecil writes: The Cav Daily is reporting that the state Secretary of the Administration has given the green light to UVA’s proposed parking garage. Look for ground-breaking to start soon, or will the LMNA take another stab at stopping it?
Cecil writes: The Cav Daily is reporting that the state Secretary of the Administration has given the green light to UVA’s proposed parking garage. Look for ground-breaking to start soon, or will the LMNA take another stab at stopping it?
Indie writes: If you were to read Jeff Peyton’s editorial in this week’s Observer, you might think the most pressing issue of the day is the “trash-talking” that goes on behind-the-scenes in the local print advertising world. Doesn’t his editorial do the same thing he accuses the others of doing ie. badmouthing the competition? In a related item, what of the recent exodus of staff from the Observer? It also appears that the Observer’s recent expansion to several sections has imploded. Once there were only two weeklies, The C-Ville Weekly and The Observer. Will The Hook replace The Observer as the second weekly, leaving The Observer to die out?
Every time we run a meta-news story about a weekly, things tend to get ugly. Please, folks, let’s keep this civil.
Cecil writes: Apparently Marco Chapman, a man accused of a horrific crime in northern Kentucky built part of his crime resume here in Charlottesville. You can read this story about his entire crime career, but I’ve pasted the parts that are relevant to Cvillians below. Does anyone remember this incident from 2000?
“[Chapman] was still under federal supervision when he was next arrested on Sept. 28, 2000. This time it was in Charlottesville, Va., outside of a popular University of Virginia student bar. According to the case file from the Virginia Circuit Court, Chapman was charged with malicious wounding for beating a foreign student from the university in a ferocious attack. Commonwealth Attorney Dave Chapman, no relation, said that he couldn’t comment on the facts of the case, but did say that Marco Chapman pleaded guilty seven months later to a lesser offense. The plea brought a one-year jail sentence, though the judge agreed to suspend six months of the term. In the hearings leading up to that plea, though, the incident was described in detail. Chapman, who was apparently in Charlottesville with his brother to visit a cousin, was drinking in a campus bar. While there, he and his relatives confronted the group of foreign students after one of them apparently stepped on the foot of either Chapman, his brother or cousin. After bouncers broke up the fracas, all parties were asked to leave because of bar fighting policy.
Chapman and his family members were thrown out, with the foreign students filing out a few minutes later. Chapman’s group was waiting just off the bar property and after taunting them, he attacked.”
Albemarle detective K.W. Robinson has been sentenced to 90 days in jail for his August 2001 assault on recently-acquitted suspect Corey Faison while Faison was in custody and undergoing interrogation. The judge described Robinson’s attack on Faison as “pure assault and battery, any way you look at it.” Rejecting Robinson’s defense that the beating of Faison (which required medical attention at a hospital) was reasonable force with police guidelines, Judge R. Edwin Burnette Jr. said: “If that is the case, then I fear for all our safety.” Adrienne Schwisow has an extensive story in today’s Progress that provides much more information.
In response to Matthew Farrell’s recent letter declaring himself to be “Downtown Charlottesville’s Leading Public Intellectual,” cvillenews.com reader Valerie L’Herrou has provided an article on City Council’s controversial new plan to install stocks and pillories on the Downtown Mall in an effort to curb “Downtown Charlottesville’s Leading Public Nuisance.” (Remember, folks, Jefferson with a moustache means satire.)
City Council to place stocks and pillories on downtown mall
Denies “leading public nuisance” a factor in decision
In a surprise announcement which stunned much of the city today, Charlottesville Mayor Maurice Cox announced that a federal law-enforcement grant would be used to purchase stocks and pillories, to be placed on the downtown mall for the punishment and deterrence of “public nuisances.”
Cox denied that recent antics by self-proclaimed “leading public nuisance” Matthew Farrell had anything to do with the decision. “The city applied for this grant two years ago. We need to use the funds now or we will lose them. The decision had already been made.”
Others were not so sure. “I think the mayor is being disingenuous,” said one downtown coffee drinker, who asked not be identified. “The word on the street is that Farrell is the reason they’re getting those stocks. After all, look at what they’re defining as a nuisance–mannered behavior and over-dressing. And I, for one, will be among the first to throw a rotten tomato at that cream-colored suit.”
Charlottesville’s social-justice community was outraged by the decision. Demonstrators gathered on the corner of Main Street in front of the Federal building, carrying signs reading “Just Say No to Stocks (and bonds)” and “City Council: selling out lock, stock and barrel.” One demonstrator explained, “see, it’s like the stock market, their stocks aren’t worth anything on the world market, so they’re like, dumping them here in small-town America. It’s part of the evil spread of global capitalism.”
Informed of the criticism, City Councilors took it in stride. “It’s about time we had some sense of law and order in this city,” said Republican Councilor Rob Schilling. “Now maybe we’ll see less graffiti. And I’m glad that council was able to agree that linen suits and bowties are grounds for the pillory. Over the next year, the ordinance will be expanded to require anyone wearing Hawaiian shirts, designer clothes, or any item of clothing or hairstyle costing over $100 to be placed in the stocks.” Asked about length of hair, Schilling replied, “come on, I may be a Republican, but I’m not unreasonable. Naturally, any hairstyle popular after 1964 and before 1975 will be exempt from the ordinance.”
Downtown merchants and stylists expressed displeasure with the ordinance. “We don’t have a single item of clothing that costs less than $120,” complained one retailer. “This will really dampen the economy of the mall.”
“Matthew Farrell’s hairstyle was on the verge of becoming really popular,” complained a salon owner. “And it needs to be trimmed every few days to look right. Even women were coming in to ask for that cut. I predict several salons will close down.”
Professional commentators were quick to add their two cents. “Charlottesville likes to consider itself a progressive city,” pontificated perennial pundit Larry Sabato. “So naturally this seems shocking to many. However, we must remember that Charlottesville is a colonial-era city, and it retains its colonial character in many ways. The ubiquitous use of bricks for building material, for instance. And we can see in this decision some of the tension between the revolutionary colonists, who favored the ‘natural look’ in fashions, and the loyalists, who preferred the ‘dandy’ look of powdered wigs and lace cuffs.”
Others contended that the “Farrell nuisance” was likely to be a short-lived fad. “Hey, another summer like this one, and he’s going to trade those suits for shorts and flip-flops,” one flippant observer remarked. “That, or he’ll die of heat stroke. Either way, we’ll be rid of him — and there won’t be any need of the pillory.”
Recent Comments