I love how gingerly the Progress approaches this story of how some dopey, drunk student in a lacrosse helmet was hit by a car. It’s the last sentence that really makes it. #
I love how gingerly the Progress approaches this story of how some dopey, drunk student in a lacrosse helmet was hit by a car. It’s the last sentence that really makes it. #
There is no mention of alcohol in the article, so it could very well just be a dopey student.
“Hallman’s lacrosse helmet had apparently hindered his vision, according to the police report.” is my favorite line.
Just because it’s a UVA student in a lacrosse helment at 12:21 in the morning, you should not prejudice your headline with the added “drunk”.
I should have said prejudice your post since you did not use “drunk” in the headline. Can we not edit our posts?
I actually like the way the paper did this one. Deadpan is the way to go on something this absurd.