Charlottesville Tomorrow released a survey on Monday that shows very strong support for rural preservation in Albemarle County. Both The Daily Progress and The Hook report on it, highlighting the finding that 78% of us support the “phasing” concept, which would limit the rate of growth. Just such a proposal failed 3-3 before the BoS last year.
The frustrating thing for me is that developers and people with development interests make a point to attend these meetings to make public comment. That’s both because they’ve got paid staff, or because it is in their direct financial interest. I know it’s a pain, but average citizens really need to submit public comments and attend meetings when important issues come up, otherwise we aren’t represented. While I think the BOS should have shown some reproductive organs and done the right thing, it’s understandable that they caved in to developers and land barons when those were the majority of people that showed up to comment on the Phasing and Clustering.
I think the second way that we make a difference is by voting. All three people that voted against Rural Preservation are up for reelection. If we are serious about preserving rural areas then we should boot all three of them out. Wyant, Dorrier, and Boyd should all be removed and replaced with people that reflect the public opinion on Growth issues. Of course, it isn’t too late for any of the current BOS to “see the light”. There’s an important meeting about Critical Slope coming up next week that will have a siginificant impact on rural preservation. Maybe BOS incumbants can use this as an opportunity to show that they aren’t just representing the developers after all.
Oh and in response to Paul Wright’s comments in the hook
I think we’ve discussed the first point ad nauseum, but I’d also like to point out that Dorrier’s seat is also up for grabs. So Charlottesville Tomorrow’s timely message for voters may indeed apply to incumbants, but it’s also relevant that it applies across party lines.
As to the second point, did residents of Crozet write a check to Albemarle County when they gained additional development rights? Where were the property rights folks when that happened? Sure, they have no problem taking tax breaks and free money for development worth hundreds of millions, but somehow when the county wants to restrict, using the same zoning that granted rights elsewhere, then there is a storm of protest from developers and land barons. Most of them knew they were in the rural area when they acquired their property, so it seems disingenious that when the County tries to actually put some teeth into zoning that they complain that they aren’t allowed to thwart the taxpayers will by making their rural parcel suburban. Until houses become a “crop” like corn, then restricting development in the rural area has nothing to do with property rights.
One of the most interesting points found in the survey was the fact 80 percent of those who responded said they would support using tax dollars to support rural preservation if that preservation was in the form of permanent easements. On the other side of the coin, the survey showed that 40 percent of those who responded stated they were opposed to spending money on the Land Use tax rip off for wealthy land owners and developers. I did contact Brian Wheeler and found out that when the question was asked, they did not exclude those who were getting the tax break, so it’s fair to assume if they asked only those who were paying for this scam, the number of those opposed would have been higher.
The good news is that despite double digit tax increases over the past two taxes years, residents are still willing to invest in rural preservation as long as it’s not in the form of Land Use tax breaks to the rich. It’s good to see this issue is getting some traction and I hope it will be part of the debate in the upcoming elections.
As for the elections, it will be interesting to see if this survey is an indication for voting trends, since the 3 incumbents appear to be on the wrong side of many of the issues, phasing and clustering being just one. Only time will tell.
I don’t put much stock in anything Charlottesville Tomorrow says. It’s a stridently anti-growth organization masquerading as some sort Everyman representative under the flag of nonpartisanship. So I’m shocked, shocked, that a survey run by them should yield these results.
I’m trying to figure out what part of that is bad. Do you mean that you’re pro-growth, so you just mistrust them because their interests are counter to yours? Are you opposed to nonpartisanship?
These findings on protecting rural areas are in line with prior surveys. Albemarle’s own survey found last October that: