Belle writes: Federal prosecutors yesterday dropped capital murder charges against Darrel Rice for the May 1996 slayings of two women in Shenandoah National Park. There are stories in the Progress and the Post.
I hiked the AT that year, and was quite relieved when Rice was caught. I have a hard time believing that Rice didn’t kill Lollie and Julianne, but I figure that the feds know more than I do.
>>>I hiked the AT that year, and was quite relieved when Rice was caught. <<<<<
I am glad you were relieved but the odds in favor of you undergoing an attack are probably about the same now as then.
I am glad you were relieved but the odds in favor of you undergoing an attack are probably about the same now as then.
Perhaps. But remember the circumstances. Two girls along the AT were murdered in their tent. There were no leads. I — along with hundreds of other hikers — were hiking northward towards that area of the AT, the whole while being interviewed by the FBI and seeing posters in each town and shelter warning us that the killer may be among us. In fact, I hiked with the FBI’s prime suspect for a week; turned out that he was, in fact, a heavily-armed murderer, just not the right heavily-armed murderer. (The FBI hauled him in and sent him back to the Oregon insane asylum from which he’d escaped. I and my friends got a pancake breakfast for our troubles.)
All of this is to say that while you may be right, it really doesn’t mean much while hearing twigs crack in the dark forest at night, while camped just a day’s walk from the site of the murders.
What is your point?