Used Cars Mean Fewer $$$ for City?

dsewell writes: According to mayor David Brown, lower Blue Book values for used cars translates into lower tax revenues for the city. I don’t get it. “Brown says used cars are flooding the market because people are buying a lot of new cars with all the incentives out there.” So if people are buying new cars, shouldn’t the higher assessments on them offset the lower values on used cars? Or are people buying new cars everywhere but in C’ville?

Perhaps that commercial about cars being cheaper in the country is having its impact? ;)

6 Responses to “Used Cars Mean Fewer $$$ for City?”


Comments are currently closed.

Sideblog